Skip to content

Beware of the Ego and Its Ambitions

Lesson 12 · Quarter 3 2026 · 09/06/2026 · 19 min read

By Equipe Marcas Editora

The video has automatic English dubbing. If you hear Portuguese, open the player settings (⚙) → Audio track → English.

Golden Text

“For I was overjoyed when the brothers came and testified about your devotion to the truth, in which you continue to walk.” (3 John 3, BSB) · Read in the Bible

John's third letter fits on a card and holds two portraits we recognize from afar: Gaius, who lives to serve, and Diotrephes, who lives to be served. The lesson does not teach anyone to sniff out a Diotrephes in others — it turns the mirror inward and asks where each of us wants the first place. It also shows that ambition is not a sin: studying, dreaming of a career, and wanting to grow are good things. The problem is the ego that turns the work of God into a stage. And the lesson ends where it had to end: in Christ, who, being God, made Himself of no reputation and took the form of a servant.

There is a specific pain that almost everyone has felt and almost no one talks about: you did something good and someone else got the credit.

You organized the project, but someone else presented it. You cleaned the whole house and your mom thanked your brother. You had the idea, and the idea became "his idea." Notice what really bothers you in those moments. Often it is not the loss — it is the fact that no one knows it was you.

That feeling has a name, and the name is very old: ego.

Today's lesson takes a tiny letter, almost a note, to deal with this. It is as short as the letter we studied last Sunday — both fit on a postcard. And inside it there are two portraits we recognize right away: a man who lived to serve and a man who lived to be served.

Before going on, a warning about how to read this lesson, because it is easy to misuse. The mirror here is for you. It is not a list of symptoms for you to go around identifying who in your church is the villain of the story. If you finish this class with a name in your head other than your own, the lesson did not work.

In this class we are going to meet the three names that appear in this letter, separate legitimate ambition from ego — which are not the same thing — and arrive at the only place where this conversation can end: in Christ.

1. A letter of two names

The writer is the apostle John, around AD 90, from Ephesus, already old, already an experienced leader. And unlike almost all the letters in the New Testament, this one is not addressed to a church: it is addressed to a person. "The elder, To the beloved Gaius, whom I love in the truth:" (3 John 1).

The purpose of the letter is twofold, and the two sides appear side by side. On one side, John writes to commend Gaius for his hospitality and support toward the missionaries who passed through there. On the other, he writes to warn about a man named Diotrephes, who was causing division in that church. And a third name also appears at the end, almost in passing: Demetrius, the man of whom everyone gave a good testimony.

Three names, three portraits: Gaius, an example of faithfulness. Diotrephes, an example of pride. Demetrius, an example of a good testimony.

The Golden Text is the sentence with which John opens his commendation: "For I was overjoyed when the brothers came and testified about your devotion to the truth, in which you continue to walk." (3 John 3). And right after that he says something worth stopping to read twice: "I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth." (3 John 4).

Notice where the news came from. It was not Gaius who told him. It was other people who came to John and spoke about him. Keep that detail in mind, because it will come back later.

🏛 Curiosity — what it meant to welcome the brothers. In the first century there were no Christian church buildings, no reliable hotels, and no organized network of churches. Missionaries traveled from city to city and depended entirely on the hospitality of those who were already Christians: a bed, food, and a house where the congregation could meet. That is why John writes that they set out for the sake of His Name, receiving nothing from the Gentiles (3 John 7) — in other words, they did not charge outsiders, they did not turn preaching into a business. And he concludes: "Therefore we ought to support such men, so that we may be fellow workers for the truth." (3 John 8). Whoever hosted them was not a supporting actor in the mission. He was a fellow worker in it. Opening one's home was, literally, taking part in the work.

2. Gaius: faithful in everything, and loves without choosing

John sums up Gaius in one sentence: "Beloved, you are faithful in what you are doing for the brothers, and especially since they are strangers to you." (3 John 5).

Two things in that sentence deserve attention.

In everything he did. That does not mean Gaius never sinned. It means he did not have one version of himself for church and another for the rest of life. His faithfulness was not a Sunday outfit.

And this is where the lesson touches you in a very direct way. It is relatively easy to look spiritual inside the church — the environment helps, everyone is doing the same thing. True character shows up in other places: at school, in the group chat, in the way you talk when you are annoyed, in honesty in your studies, in what you do when no one from church is watching.

Think of an ordinary scene. The test is hard, half the class cheated, no one got caught, and no one is going to get caught. Not cheating there does not give you a grade, does not get you praise, does not give you anything visible. That isero-sum proof of why it is faithfulness: it is the part of your life that only God sees.

And toward strangers. The second mark of Gaius is even more uncomfortable. He treated those from inside and those from outside the same way. He did not pick and choose whom to serve.

The ego, when it acts, always picks and chooses. It calculates: is it worth being seen helping this person? Does this bring me closer to the people I want to be around? Does this pay off? Loving like Christ is the opposite of that — it is serving without keeping score, because the Bible is firm in saying that God shows no partiality (Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; James 2:1).

Translate that into your week. A new student arrives at school and no one starts a conversation with him, because he is different, or shy, or does not fit in anywhere. The group has already decided he is not worth the effort. Sitting next to that person will not earn you anything — and that is the exact point. Whoever loves like Christ does not ask who deserves it.

3. Diotrephes: the man who wanted the first place

Now the heavy part of the letter. And John does not beat around the bush:

"I have written to the church about this, but Diotrephes, who loves to be first, will not accept our instruction." (3 John 9)

Read the middle expression again: who loves to be first among them. It is not a generic accusation of pride. It is a very specific description of a man who wanted to be first inside the church.

Ω In the original — Greek. The word translated as loving to be first among them is philoprōteúōn (φιλοπρωτεύων). It is made of two pieces glued together: philéo, to love, to like; and prōtos, first. Literally, "the one who loves to be first." This word appears only once in the entire New Testament — it was coined here, for this case. And notice that the Greek does not describe an office: it describes an affection. Diotrephes' problem was not on his badge; it was in what he loved.

It is also worth noting that "ego" is neither a religious term nor an insult. In Greek, egṓ (ἐγώ) — and later, in Latin, ego — simply means "I." It is the shortest word in the language and the hardest one to move out of the center.

The text shows the damage happening in three layers:

First: he spoke evil of the leadership. John says that Diotrephes had been spreading malicious words against them (3 John 10). It was not open and honest disagreement — it was talk behind their backs, insinuation, rumor. The Bible takes words seriously because words build up and words tear down.

Today this has become cheaper than ever. An offensive joke in the group chat, a comment about a leader without knowing half the facts, a forwarded screenshot, an "I heard that." No one needs to climb onto a stage to ruin someone's reputation: thirty seconds and a phone are enough.

And there is a root to this that the lesson points out plainly: rebellion against those who lead almost always springs from a heart that refuses to be corrected. A leader gives you guidance. Instead of thinking about it, you talk back right away, defend yourself right away, go complain to your friends right away. Whoever rejects all correction closes the door to their own growth — and that door locks from the inside.

Second: he blocked others. He refuses to welcome the brothers, stops those who want to do so, and puts them out of the church (3 John 10). Notice the scale of this. It was not enough for Diotrephes not to serve; he stopped those who wanted to serve. It was not enough to reject the missionaries; he threw out those who welcomed them.

The ego does not sit quietly in its corner. It creates cliques, creates rivalry, creates exclusion. A group of teenagers that decides, without saying it out loud, that so-and-so is not welcome in the activities — because they do not like him, because he is awkward, because he does not fit in — is doing, on their scale, the exact same thing Diotrephes was doing on his. Pride divides; love unites. And the contrast with John is striking: the same apostle would introduce himself in Revelation as a fellow partaker in the affliction and in the kingdom (Revelation 1:9).

Third: he used the church as a stage. This is the heart of the lesson. Diotrephes was not wrong for wanting to lead — the Bible treats leadership as something good and necessary. He was wrong in his motive. Jesus taught that authority in the Kingdom is exercised by serving, not by bossing others around. When the heart seeks position above purpose, ministry stops glorifying Christ and starts glorifying the person.

There is a small, spot-on example of this, right at your age level: the young person who only agrees to take part in praise when they get to sing solo and show off their talent; when given another role, they lose interest. It was not the role that changed. It was the spotlight that disappeared. Many people want the position; few want the responsibility that comes with it.

🔬 Our reading. Now the most important warning in this article, and it needs to be spelled out plainly: 3 John 10 is not permission for you to expose anyone. John was an apostle. He had authority over that church, was going there in person, and would deal with the matter head-on, in the presence of the congregation. That is church governance, carried out by someone who holds responsibility — it is not a model for a teenager to organize an exposé, put together a dossier, or start a debate in a group chat. When you see something wrong in your church, the Christian path is this: pray, and speak privately with the leadership or with your parents. No audience, no screenshots, no "I'm just venting." The only exception is a serious situation that harms someone or puts someone at risk: then you tell a trusted adult right away, and the adult handles it. Aside from that, the rule is simple: gossip does not become service to God just because the topic is spiritual.

4. Ambition is not a sin. Ego is.

Here the lesson needs surgical precision, because it is easy to walk out of a study like this afraid of wanting anything at all.

So let us separate things properly. Wanting to grow is not a sin. Studying to pass, practicing to play better, dreaming of a career, wanting to learn, wanting to do what you do well — none of that is Diotrephes. The Bible commands us to work with dedication and calls laziness a problem, not a virtue. God is not honored when a believer turns in their worst.

What the lesson condemns is something else: the ego that uses the work of God as a stage. It is the ambition that steps on people. It is wanting the front spot more than wanting the Kingdom.

Paul puts this in a way that leaves no escape: "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or empty pride, but in humility consider others more important than yourselves." (Philippians 2:3). And he adds: "Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others." (Philippians 2:4). Notice the word "also." Paul did not tell you to stop existing, or to stop taking care of your own life. He told you to stop looking only at it.

The saddest diagnosis in the chapter is a short sentence Paul drops almost in passing: "For all the others look after their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ." (Philippians 2:21). That was written about Christians. About church people.

So instead of trying to measure the size of your pride — which is impossible to measure honestly — use three concrete questions. They are meant to be answered in silence, inside your own head:

  1. If no one knew what you do for God, would you keep doing it with the same willingness?
  2. What makes your heart happier: seeing Christ glorified or seeing yourself recognized?
  3. When someone else is praised for something you also do well, what happens on the inside?

The third one is usually the most revealing. It is easy to be humble when you are alone.

5. Do not follow what is evil — and the name almost no one remembers

After describing Diotrephes, John does not leave the story without an application. He turns to Gaius and says:

"Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. The one who does good is of God; the one who does evil has not seen God." (3 John 11)

Notice the verb: follow — or imitate. John is talking about imitation. And the Christian life, in the end, is a sequence of choices about whom to imitate.

This is especially important at your age, because this is the stage of life when the most people are competing for that spot: school, the crowd, the accounts you follow, the artist, the athlete, the influencer, and sometimes even someone inside the church. The question most people ask is "is this person famous?" The right question is different: "does this person's life point to God?" Not everything that goes viral deserves to be copied.

And the second half of the verse says something strong: whoever does good is of God. Be careful not to read that as "good works save" — that is not what it means, and the Bible is clear that we are saved by grace. What John is saying is that our life gives away whom we belong to. God is the source of all goodness; so true goodness bears His mark. Good works do not buy salvation, but they reveal a life that has been changed.

And this is where our faith comes in: we believe that the new birth and the empowering of the Holy Spirit make the Christian able to reject sin and live in holiness. It is not willpower, and it is not automatic either. Grace empowers; you cooperate. Every day. Diotrephes is proof that it is possible to be inside the church and resist that grace — and Gaius is proof that it is possible to cooperate with it even in the things no one sees.

Finally, the name almost no one remembers. Before closing the letter, John writes: "Demetrius has received a good testimony from everyone, and from the truth itself. We also testify for him, and you know that our testimony is true." (3 John 12).

Demetrius has no recorded speech, no spectacular feat, not a single line of biography. He has only one thing: people spoke well of him. And from what we understand of the custom of the time, he was probably the one who carried this letter in his hand to Gaius — the mail carrier of the story, the guy who did the job.

Notice the final contrast of the letter. Diotrephes fought to be first and was marked forever as the example of pride. Demetrius simply did what was right, and the Bible recorded his name with a note anyone would love to have.

Christ in the Lesson

The opposite of Diotrephes is not "being humble." Humility, by itself, is just a behavior — and behavior can be faked. The opposite of Diotrephes is a Person.

And there is a scene in the Gospel that needs to be told here, because it keeps this lesson from turning into spiritual arrogance.

Two disciples came up to Jesus with a request: "They answered, “Grant that one of us may sit at Your right hand and the other at Your left in Your glory.”" (Mark 10:37). They wanted the two best seats. They wanted the first place.

And one of those two was John. The very same man who, sixty years later, would write against Diotrephes for wanting the first place.

Hold on to that, because it changes the tone of everything. When John denounces the love of first place, he is not speaking from a pedestal. He is speaking as someone who once asked for that very thing and was corrected by Jesus Himself. This lesson is not a pointed finger; it is a man showing his own scar.

And look at how Jesus answered the two disciples' request. He did not say, "how absurd, forget about greatness." He did something far more interesting: He redefined what it means to be great.

"But it shall not be this way among you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be the slave of all. For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many." (Mark 10:43-45)

Read it slowly: Jesus did not forbid wanting to be great. He said which way leads there. In the Kingdom, the way up goes through the bottom.

And He did not teach that from a distance. Paul tells how it happened:

"Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to death — even death on a cross." (Philippians 2:5-8)

Stop at that phrase: emptying Himself — making Himself of no reputation.

Diotrephes fought for reputation inside a small provincial church. Jesus had all the glory of the universe and gave it up. One fought for a place of prominence in front of a few dozen people; the Other, being God, accepted the lowest place that existed — the cross, the death reserved for slaves and criminals.

And the next verse closes the circle: "Therefore God exalted Him to the highest place and gave Him the name above all names," (Philippians 2:9). The first place that Diotrephes tried to seize by force was given to Christ, because He went down first.

So the question of this lesson was never "are you proud?" The question is: who holds the first place in your heart — Christ or yourself?

And the answer is not for you to try harder to be humble. It is to look at Him for so long that your "I" stops being the subject.

Practical Application

Examine the motive, not the size. Do not stop dreaming, do not stop studying, do not stop wanting to do things well. Just ask, before every decision this week: does this glorify God or does it only feed my ego? That question fits into five seconds and protects an entire year.

Serve once without credit. The most honest test that you are not on a stage is to do something good that no one will know was you. It is not about being a hero. It is so you can feel the difference.

Spend time with someone who earns you nothing. Once this week, sit next to someone who is alone, or start a conversation with someone the group ignores. Gaius treated insiders and outsiders the same way.

Accept a correction without defending yourself. When someone guides you — your dad, your mom, a teacher, a leader — hold your answer for ten seconds and listen all the way to the end before arguing. A teachable spirit is not weakness; it is the only door through which growth enters.

Cut off gossip at its entry point. If a comment about someone from church reaches you, your part is simple: do not pass it on. You do not need to lecture anyone, you do not need to announce that you are not going to comment. Just do not pass it on.

And if you saw something truly wrong, take it to those who hold responsibility. Pray for that person and talk privately with the leadership or with your parents. If it is something serious, tell a trusted adult right away. What is never the right path is the group chat.

Closing Prayer

Lord Jesus, You had all glory and made Yourself of no reputation for me. I have almost nothing and still fight for the first place. Forgive me for the times I wanted to be seen more than to be useful, and for the times I served only because someone was watching. Guard my mouth from speaking evil of people. Give me a heart that accepts correction without defending itself. And Lord, help me not to walk out of here looking for faults in others: the mirror is mine. May I want to grow, yes, but in the way You taught — by serving. In Your name, amen.

Soli Deo Gloria — Scripture governs; everything else, on its knees.

Frequently asked questions about this lesson

Wanting to grow, dreaming of a career, wanting to be good at what I do — is that being Diotrephes?+

No. And it is important not to leave class with that confusion in your head. The Bible never told anyone to be mediocre on purpose: it tells us to do everything wholeheartedly, as for the Lord. Diotrephes' problem was not the size of his dream; it was the owner of the dream. He wanted the first place among the brothers and used the church as a stepping stone for that. There is a simple and honest test: notice what happens to you when first place does not come. If you keep studying, serving, and doing things well even without the spotlight, your ambition is in the right place. If without the spotlight you lose the desire, it is not the work that moves you — it is the applause.

If I tell people about the good I did, or post about it, have I become Diotrephes?+

Not necessarily, and notice a detail in the text: the one who praised Gaius publicly was John, and the ones who testified to his love before the church were other people (3 John 6). Gaius did not advertise himself — others told the story. The right question is not 'can I tell?', it is 'what for?'. Telling in order to encourage someone to do the same is one thing; telling in order to be admired is another. Jesus dealt with this quite frankly when speaking of giving to the needy and praying just to be seen (Matthew 6:1-6). And there is a practical way to check: if no one liked the post, would you have done it the same way?

What if Diotrephes is my leader? What do I do?+

First, one thing needs to be clear: that is not the task this lesson gives you. John was an apostle and had authority over that church — what he did in 3 John 10 was an act of apostolic authority, not an example for a teenager to follow. The text does not authorize you to expose, point out, or confront anyone, much less bring up a subject like that in a group chat. The Christian path, when you notice something wrong, is different: pray for that person and talk privately with the church leadership or with your parents, with those who have the responsibility to handle it. One important exception: if it is something serious that hurts someone or puts someone at risk, you tell a trusted adult right away — father, mother, pastor, teacher. That is not gossip, it is protection, and it is the adult who resolves it.

Is humility putting yourself down and refusing to accept compliments?+

No, and that version of humility tires anyone out. False humility is ego in reverse: it is still a conversation about you, just in the negative now. Notice that Gaius received a written compliment from an apostle, and the Bible preserved it. Biblical humility is not thinking you are worthless; it is stopping looking only inward. That is exactly what Paul writes: "Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others." (Philippians 2:4). A humble person is not someone who thinks they are small — it is someone who is able to see the other person.

If there was a Diotrephes right inside the apostle John's church, why should I trust a church today?+

That question is fair, and the answer starts with a compliment to the Bible itself: notice that it did not hide the problem. The letter could have stayed only on the praises to Gaius, and it did not — the name, the conduct, and the damage of Diotrephes are there, written down and preserved for two thousand years. A book invented to promote an institution does not do that. Besides, the church has never stood on the quality of its members. If it depended on that, it would have ended in the first century. It stands on Christ. Having wrong people inside does not prove that the Gospel is false; it proves that it is still needed, including for those who are already inside.

Teens

Quarter 3